Posts Tagged ‘systemic risk’

Why Is Financial Protection Important And Why Is It Not Reaching Lower Income Countries?

Written by admin on November 26, 2013. Posted in Climate Change, Disaster Financing, Index Insurance, Lower Income Countries

eumetsat

Super Typhoon Haiyan satellite image.

Droughts, floods, heat waves, and tropical cyclones are on the rise. According to the UK Met Office, climate related hazards affected over 220 million people on average every year in the period 2000-2009. Extreme events destroy livelihoods and undermine the capacity of communities to adapt to even moderate shocks.

Financial disaster risk management (FDRM) reduces the cost and consequences of disasters. On the macro level, economies with deep insurance and financial markets recover faster (Pollner, 2012). Moreover, uninsured losses have been shown to drive the economic cost of disasters (Von Peter, von Dahlen, and Saxena, 2012). As we have highlighted in a previous post, the most vulnerable are least likely to be insured. Low insurance penetration coupled with high vulnerability stunts economic activity and reduces resilience to disaster shocks.

Disaster risk alters investment and production decisions and leads to higher cost of both equity and debt capital. In the absence of suitable risk management alternatives:

  • Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) engage in low risk, low return strategies;
  • Lenders ration credit in vulnerable regions and economic sectors;
  • Some firms simply chose not to locate in vulnerable regions;
  • International investors limit the supply of capital to vulnerable regions and sectors.

Consequently, many investments are not funded or those that are funded are more likely to be undercapitalized when disaster risks are present. This dynamic has profound implications for development and poverty alleviation.

Traditional insurance markets (e.g., property insurance, agricultural insurance) have limited reach in low income and emerging economies due to a long list of market and structural failures. Technological and capital market advancements create new opportunities for FDRM innovations that are better suited for conditions prevalent in lower income countries. However, commercial providers of these products (i.e., insurers and reinsurers) are reluctant to focus on lower income countries due to free rider problems, uncertainty about market potential, legal and other barriers. Consequently, innovations in FDRM are largely financed through donor interventions. Yet, donor intervention in this space thus far has not scaled largely because limited pilot projects do not address these barriers and market failures. Efforts to extend index insurance to vulnerable regions, for example, have met with limited success because:

• Risk assessment and product pricing is difficult in data sparse environments and insurers and reinsurers respond to this uncertainty by pricing products too high;
• Legal and regulatory frameworks are typically underdeveloped and institutional capacity for supervising these products is deficient;
• Clients require extensive capacity building to fully appreciate the value of insurance; and the list goes on.

In the next post, we will examine the effect of disaster risk on financial inclusiveness of SMEs and implications for economic growth and resilience building.

 

References:

Pollner, J. D. “Financial and Fiscal Instruments for Catastrophe Risk Management: Addressing Losses From Flood Hazards In Central Europe.” A World Bank Study 70911, The World Bank, Washington, DC, DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-9579-0, January, 2012.
von Peter, G., S. parental locks von Dahlen, and S. C. Saxena. “Unmitigated Disasters? New Evidence on the Macroeconomic Cost of Natural Catastrophes.” Working Papers 394, Bank for International Settlements (BIS), Basel, Switzerland, December, 2012.

 

Portfolio Protection against Earthquake Disaster

Written by Nadezda on February 27, 2013. Posted in Disaster Financing, Earthquake Risk, EQII, Financial Institutions, Indonesia, Parametric Insurance, Peru

BMKGGlobalAgRisk, in collaboration with  PT. Asuransi MAIPARK Indonesia and Aon Benfield Asia Pacific, is developing index-based earthquake insurance in Indonesia to strengthen the resiliency of the financial sector that serves lower income households and small and medium enterprises. Earthquakes can have profound impacts on bank operations, depleting the bank’s capital base, reducing liquidity, and lowering profits. The product called “EQII,” or “Earthquake Index Insurance,” is designed to transfer portfolio risks of financial institutions, enabling them to expand access to financial services in vulnerable, under-served areas and to aid in local recovery through continued lending after an earthquake event.

This project builds on innovation in northern Peru, where the threat of extreme El Niño significantly constrains the provision of financial services to the poor. As of 2011, banks can purchase index-based portfolio insurance that uses measures of sea surface temperatures as the basis for payouts. Designed by GlobalAgRisk, the Extreme El Niño Insurance Product (EENIP) is the world’s first “forecast’ insurance coverage, providing payments even before the arrival of catastrophic flooding. A top-ranked microfinance institution purchased EENIP in 2011 and 2012. The market development progress in Peru has stimulated a great deal of interest among development finance institutions, the reinsurance industry, and neighboring countries to explore opportunities for adapting and replicating this important model of ex ante disaster risk financing (click here to read the EENIP press release).

Indonesia’s financial sector faces one of the highest earthquake exposures in the world. This exposure is perhaps most evident on financial institutions that have limited opportunities to diversify geographically. Localized institutions dominate Indonesia’s financial landscape and have the greatest outreach to small and medium enterprises — the country’s economic engine. Therefore, helping financial institutions to better manage earthquake risk has important economic implications, contributing to the goals of development and poverty alleviation.

When many borrowers suffer losses at the same time, geographically concentrated institutions such as rural banks and microfinance lenders simultaneously experience sharp spikes in bad loans, deposit withdrawals, and falling revenues. The ensuing capital and liquidity problems can lead to insolvency of some institutions, while those who survive struggle to regain profitability many years after the event. Without significant recapitalization, banks are forced to stop lending precisely when the community is in greatest need of resources for recovery and rebuilding, which also represents a significant lost opportunity to generate new income.

A recent Asian Development Bank (ADB) report highlights the importance of natural disaster risk financing solutions for the Asia-Pacific region in strengthening its disaster resilience. The report finds that risk financing instruments, including disaster insurance, are key to building the region’s resilience against disaster and reversing the erosion of Asia’s economic resources. The consequences of unmanaged earthquake risk on Indonesia’s banking system epitomize this erosion. In the absence of disaster risk financing, banks cope by curtailing lending to vulnerable clients, raising interest rates, and maintaining high capital reserves to absorb shocks. These strategies are inefficient from a business standpoint and highly undesirable from a development perspective.

Disaster risk insurance is an important piece of any comprehensive disaster risk management strategy. Using EQII to help financial institutions become more resilient to earthquake risk should lead to 1) lower interest rates; 2) greater financial inclusion; 3) stronger financial institutions after an earthquake; and 4) increase in post-disaster lending. This protection can strengthen the social mission of financial institutions that serve the poor, near-poor, and small and medium enterprises, while also helping them grow and thus maintain their obligation to shareholders.

The mechanism for EQII is based on an intensity index of earthquake-induced ground motion that is mapped geographically. This information is calibrated to the financial institution’s expectation of loan non-performance across its portfolio in order to obtain the payment levels of the product.

EQII protection purchased by localized institutions makes them a better client to second-tier institutions that provide long term capital for on-lending. Since highly exposed localized institutions may have difficulties servicing their debt obligations following an earthquake shock, EQII provides an important additional level of protection to these secondary lenders. Because EQII is a new product, GlobalAgRisk is working with regional development and apex banks to purchase an umbrella or “master policy” on behalf of primary lenders. Such master policies will have re/insurance pricing advantages and represent an auspicious starting point for the market development process. If an earthquake triggers the index, insurance payments would be made directly to the local banks — the primary beneficiaries — who would be contractually obligated to use the payment solely as a capital injection. These local lenders may wish to purchase additional coverage that meets their needs given the earthquake risk exposure of their lending portfolio.

Unmanaged natural disaster risk limits growth and imposes costs at each stage of the banking system. Second-tier banks limit lending to exposed primary institutions, while these local lenders ration credit to vulnerable small and medium enterprises that represent the backbone of Indonesia’s economy. A widespread use of natural disaster financing solutions such as EQII has the potential to strengthen the entire financial system in Indonesia, while expanding the reach of financial services to the more vulnerable segments of society.

Click here to read “Strengthening Financial Institution Resilience to Earthquake Risk in Indonesia: The Role of Index Based Portfolio Insurance”

Click here to read “Portfolio Protection against Earthquake Disaster for Second-Tier Financial Institutions in Indonesia”

shakemap

Intensity Map on Population Grid for
M=7.5 Sumatra earthquake on Sep 30, 2009

 

IDB Conference on Risk Management in Agricultural Finance: Building More Inclusive and Secure Markets

Written by Nadezda on October 3, 2012. Posted in Financial Institutions, Parametric Insurance, Seminars & Workshops

The September 24, 2012 Inter-American Development Bank conference on Risk Management in Agricultural Finance examined new approaches for managing agricultural risks that help expand access to finance while lowering rural poverty and improving food security in Latin America and the Caribbean. The focus was on market-based approaches that address pervasive price and output risks in agriculture. Experts discussed the challenge facing policymakers and practitioners as they seek successful innovations that are sustainable and scalable. The conference highlighted case studies of products and institutions that are considered to be at the cutting edge and have already demonstrated effective results.

Dr. Jerry Skees presented on Creating a Regional Platform for Risk Management in LAC. Viewed form the regional perspective, there are many opportunities to diversify and transfer risks. The approach proposed is for a market based facility to manage regional risks through use of reserves, access to contingent credit, futures exchange markets, and recent innovations in risk pooling for natural disasters. Economies of scale and scope are needed for a Regional Platform to be effective with adequate capitalization and a capacity to manage a diverse portfolio of risks.

Click here to download the presentation.

Benjamin collier presented on Financial Inclusion and Protecting Bank Portfolios from Natural Disaster Risks. Sustainable financial inclusion is significantly challenged by the presence of systemic risks such as natural disasters and commodity price volatility. In general, financial institutions are poorly equipped to manage these systemic risks under current public and private sector standards. Systemic events create losses, erode capital and compromise their ability to lend. As a result, financial institutions limit their financing for vulnerable households and firms. Portfolio-level insurance against disasters can improve management of these events. The case of insurance against exposure to severe El Niño effects in Peru will be presented, showing how this product allows lenders to manage this risk more efficiently and effectively, translating into better financial performance, expansion of banking service outreach, lower interest rates, and reduced volatility in access to credit.

Click here to download the presentation.

Richard Carpenter presented on Barriers to Product and Institutional Innovations. What is the appropriate legal and regulatory setting to support new innovations in insurance and derivatives? What are the needed upgrades to banking regulation and supervision? Based on experiences in various countries, the presentation identifies what are the main “gaps” found in emerging market economies that inhibit the use of state-of-the-art financial instruments. Also discussed are lessons regarding how to overcome these barriers.

Click here to download the presentation.